Lovehoney says it is “unfairly disadvantaged” by Google SafeSearch

Lovehoney has claimed the new Google SafeSearch feature prevented over 700,000 adults from visiting its website in the run-up to Christmas.

The sexual wellness brand has said its website traffic suffered in the two months before Christmas and early January, with visit numbers significantly lower than normal. This is reportedly due to SafeSearch and accompanying changes to the Google search algorithm.

Lovehoney says it has filed more than 600 complaints against Google because of SafeSearch and its negative impact. The company cites a column written by broadcaster Jeremy Clarkson in which he explains he was unable to find products from Lovehoney and Net-a-Porter via Google.

“I decided, therefore, to begin with women’s fashion, so I visited a site called Net-a-Porter, which, it turns out, sells every single garment ever invented,” Clarkson wrote in his Boxing Day column for the Sunday Times.

“I’m not sure but I reckon there were at least 40,000 jumpers. And I couldn’t look at half of them because, for reasons that aren’t clear, my wi-fi has self-installed some kind of filter that blocks any site that contains flesh. For the same reason, I was unable to buy Lisa any stocking-fillers from Lovehoney.”

In its complaints, the brand says Google’s changes threaten consumers rights to access sex-positive content and calls for an open dialogue regarding the importance of sexual health information on the internet.

“Whilst we are in support of Google’s ‘SafeSearch’ feature for under 18’s, we would like to understand why we as a sex-positive brand, hosting a lot of educational content on our site, have been unfairly disadvantaged while other types of potentially harmful or disturbing results, like gambling or alcohol, remain visible,” said Lovehoney’s director of public relations and head of sexual empowerment, Johanna Rief.

READ MORE: Google partners with Stella McCartney to launch fashion supply chain platform

“As a brand, we stand for sexual health, education and empowerment and our products are designed to help people be in touch with their sensual needs and enhance intimacy. We would like to work with Google and have an open conversation on these points.”

In response, a Google spokesperson stated that SafeSearch automatically filters out sexually explicit material, in line with its stated policy. The policy covers content that promotes the sale of regulated goods and services such as alcohol, gambling and sexually explicit material. The spokesperson also noted that users can opt in and out of the service at any time.

“Parents have the option to turn it off or block access to Search all together. In the coming months, we’ll turn SafeSearch on for existing users under 18 and make this the default setting for people under 18 setting up new accounts,” the spokesperson said.

Lovehoney’s Rief adds: “Whilst we understand that users can turn SafeSearch off, to do so they need to be signed into a verified Google account to prove that they are 18+ years old, otherwise Google assumes that they are a minor and will not show our paid ads. Also, a lot of users aren’t even aware that this function exists, due to very little education from Google’s site on this feature.”

“Finally, and where our main frustration comes from, it seems these rules only apply to retailers from our industry. It is far easier for conventional retailers to target ads for sexual wellness products, no matter if SafeSearch is turned on or off or if users are logged into their Google account.”

“This means that large corporations are favoured, while companies such as Lovehoney, which has been fighting the sexual wellness taboo for more than 20 years now and have also invested a lot into Google Ads, are disadvantaged.”

Click here to sign up to Charged free daily email newsletter

NewsEcommerceIndustry

RELATED POSTS

1 Comment. Leave new

  • Google search is so corrupt! If it wasn’t who would pay for advertising?

    I used to spend in excess of £20K per month on Google advertising for our small online retail sites. Now I don’t spend a penny with Google. We use Affiliates, influencers, PR, our own online social media accounts and emailing lists and direct mail and our returns are much higher.

    Google sucks – I will never spend another penny with them

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.